Vielleicht ist Gott Gott, weil sie nichts kontrollieren muss.

‚Frames‘ and ‚Transcendences‘

Religion can be for example a standardised orientation frame. Or a game (epistemologically in the or rather in/nearer to the „state of nature“) with and in the unknown/unframed. Localised in and/or beyond and between etc. frames?

Earnestness and Seriousness

A:   Earnest and Serious
B:   Earnest, Not Serious
C:   Serious, Not Earnest
D:   Not Serious, Not Earnest

Four strongly reductively abstract(ed) possibilities of compositions with ‚earnest‘ and ’serious‘.

Das Aufrechterhalten des Weltbildes ist eine der Basis-„Funktionen“ der Selbst-Konstruktion des Subjekts.

Manche weisen das nicht so sehr bzw. anders etc. auf. Man könnte sie Philosophen wider Willen bzw. mit der Annahme dass nichts voluntaristisch ist: „einfach“ Philosophen nennen.

Kurt Vonnegut “All time is all time. It does not change. It does not lend itself to warnings or explanations. It simply is. Take it moment by moment, and you will find that we are all, as I’ve said before, bugs in amber.”

― Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse-Five

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/265355-all-time-is-all-time-it-does-not-change-it

Possibility and contingent frames

„Mistakes“ are without the contingent structurised frame of reference just „takes“ (and without the structure of what takes as a structurised group are: only existent singularities and other possibilities). Possibility and contigent frames.

We are no choices and no structures. Among all other possible (non)lines, we can re-construct us along these notions, in a subjective way.