Dialectics as reproducing or as changing

What’s true about dialectics seems to me, is that we, the human being, are a contradictory being in a contradictory existence (according to our own standards and logic [as the human (re-)construction of his and all existence], and maybe to the standard of the universe [ontological setup/character of the universe]).
Some dialectical thinkers try to interprete qualitative change, meaning or progress into these contradictions. Ok.
Is it tautological if a contradiction–here as an upheld/(self-)reproducing tension–is existing/reproducing for a longer time because it co-constitutes itself and it reproduces itself because it exists as constituted by a (similarity-reproducing) stability?

Holism (the abstract, non-fillable, non-completable etc. notion/idea of ‚the whole‘) is tautological and true. Truth (in a holistic sense) is tautological. So if dialectical tension is tautological, then it would be holistically true.

Mit Tag(s) versehen: , , , , , ,

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s

%d Bloggern gefällt das: